Annotated Bibliography: A Thorough Reply to Ballance’s Critical
Pespective
Source: Stockwell, G. (2012). Working with
constraints in mobile learning: A response to Ballance Language Learning
& Technology, 16(3): 24-31. Retrieved on October, 2012 from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2012/ballance.pdf
Stockwell (2012) aims
to reply thoroughly to Ballance’s (2012) critical view on his research project
findings obtained in 2010. Stockwell (2012) supports his ideas by means of
supplying some responding insights regarding the following claims posed by
Ballance (2012): the pen-and-paper nature of Stockwell’s activities designed
for MALL (Mobile assisted language learning) and the obsolete essence of Stockwell’s
findings research. With the aim of explaining in detail the nature of MALL activities,
Stockwell (2012) states that “Perhaps the most important point to clarify is
that the vocabulary selected for the activities were taken from authentic
videos of human interest stories from a US news program” (p. 24). Besides, he
highlights that during the research, students presented learning difficulties
with some vocabulary. Consequently, those demanding vocabulary items were used
in the activities. Stockwell (2012), finally reflects upon the idea that
technological evolution is part of learners’ lives; subsequently, it is also
part of the learning and researching environment.
References
Ballance,
J. O. (2012). Mobile language learning: More than just “the platform”.
Language Learning & Technology, 16(3): 21-23. Retrieved on
October, 2012 from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2012/ballance.pdf
Stockwell, G. (2012). Working with constraints
in mobile learning: A response to Ballance. Language Learning &
Technology, 16(3): 24-31. Retrieved on October, 2012 from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2012/ballance.pdf